Consensus statement on the use of alemtuzumab in daily clinical practice in Spain.

INTRODUCTION: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug approved by the European Medicines Agency as a disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: A consensus document was drafted on the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice in Spain. DEVELOPMENT: A group of multiple sclerosis specialists reviewed articles addressing treatment with alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis and published before December 2017. The included studies assessed the drug's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety; screening for infections and vaccination; and administration and monitoring aspects. The initial proposed recommendations were developed by a coordinating group and based on the available evidence and their clinical experience. The consensus process was carried out in 2 stages, with the initial threshold percentage for group agreement established at 80%. The final document with all the recommendations agreed by the working group was submitted for external review and the comments received were considered by the coordinating group. CONCLUSION: The present document is intended to be used as a tool for optimising the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice.

Consenso de expertos sobre el uso de alemtuzumab en la práctica clínica diaria en España / Consensus statement on the use of alemtuzumab in daily clinical practice in Spain

Introducción: Alemtuzumab es un fármaco de alta eficacia aprobado por la Agencia Europea de Medicamentos como tratamiento modificador de la enfermedad en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple remitente recurrente.ObjetivoElaborar un documento de consenso sobre el manejo de alemtuzumab en la práctica clínica habitual, que sea de aplicación en el ámbito español.DesarrolloUn grupo de expertos en esclerosis múltiple revisó las publicaciones disponibles hasta diciembre de 2017, de tratamiento con alemtuzumab y esclerosis múltiple. Se incluyeron trabajos sobre eficacia, efectividad y seguridad, despistaje de infecciones y vacunación, administración y monitorización. La propuesta inicial de recomendaciones fue desarrollada por un grupo coordinador con base en la evidencia disponible y en su experiencia clínica. El proceso de consenso se llevó a cabo en 2 etapas; se estableció como porcentaje inicial de acuerdo grupal el 80%. El documento final con todas las recomendaciones acordadas por el grupo de trabajo se sometió a revisión externa y los comentarios recibidos fueron considerados por el grupo coordinador.ConclusionesEl documento aportado pretende ser una herramienta útil para facilitar el manejo del fármaco en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual. (AU)

Introduction: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug approved by the European Medicines Agency as a disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis.ObjectiveA consensus document was drafted on the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice in Spain.DevelopmentA group of multiple sclerosis specialists reviewed articles addressing treatment with alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis and published before December 2017. The included studies assessed the drug's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety; screening for infections and vaccination; and administration and monitoring aspects. The initial proposed recommendations were developed by a coordinating group and based on the available evidence and their clinical experience. The consensus process was carried out in 2 stages, with the initial threshold percentage for group agreement established at 80%. The final document with all the recommendations agreed by the working group was submitted for external review and the comments received were considered by the coordinating group.ConclusionThe present document is intended to be used as a tool for optimising the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice. (AU)

Consensus statement on the use of alemtuzumab in daily clinical practice in Spain. / Consenso de expertos sobre el uso de alemtuzumab en la práctica clínica diaria en España.

INTRODUCTION: Alemtuzumab is a highly effective drug approved by the European Medicines Agency as a disease-modifying drug for the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. OBJECTIVE: A consensus document was drafted on the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice in Spain. DEVELOPMENT: A group of multiple sclerosis specialists reviewed articles addressing treatment with alemtuzumab in patients with multiple sclerosis and published before December 2017. The included studies assessed the drug's efficacy, effectiveness, and safety; screening for infections and vaccination; and administration and monitoring aspects. The initial proposed recommendations were developed by a coordinating group and based on the available evidence and their clinical experience. The consensus process was carried out in 2 stages, with the initial threshold percentage for group agreement established at 80%. The final document with all the recommendations agreed by the working group was submitted for external review and the comments received were considered by the coordinating group. CONCLUSION: The present document is intended to be used as a tool for optimising the management of alemtuzumab in routine clinical practice.

Recomendaciones para la vacunación en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple candidatos a terapias inmunosupresoras: documento de consenso español / Recommendations for vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis who are eligible for immunosuppressive therapies: Spanish consensus statement

ANTECEDENTES: La reciente aparición de terapias de alta efectividad para el tratamiento de la esclerosis múltiple (EM), con potencial riesgo de complicaciones infecciosas, obliga plantear estrategias de prevención y minimización de riesgos. La vacunación constituye una parte esencial del manejo de estos pacientes. Este consenso recoge una serie de pautas y escenarios prácticos de vacunación en pacientes adultos con EM candidatos a tratamiento inmunosupresor. METODOLOGÍA: Se llevó a cabo un consenso de tipo formal. Tras definir el alcance del documento, se realizó una búsqueda bibliográfica de vacunación en pacientes con EM, así como guías de vacunación específicas de pacientes inmunosuprimidos y en tratamiento biológico con otras enfermedades. Para la formulación de las recomendaciones se empleó la metodología de Modified Nominal Group Technique. DESARROLLO: La vacunación en pacientes candidatos a tratamiento inmunosupresor se debe plantear antes de iniciar un tratamiento inmunosupresor siempre que la situación clínica del paciente lo permita. Se recomendarán tanto aquellas indicadas en el calendario vacunal del adulto, como algunas específicas, en función de la inmunidad previa. Si ya está instaurado el tratamiento inmunosupresor las vacunas vivas atenuadas estarán contraindicadas. Para aquellas vacunas que dispongan de un correlato de protección se recomienda monitorizar la respuesta serológica transcurridos de uno a 2 meses de la última dosis

BACKGROUND: The recent development of highly effective treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the potential risk of infectious complications require the development of prevention and risk minimisation strategies. Vaccination is an essential element of the management of these patients. This consensus statement includes a series of recommendations and practical scenarios for the vaccination of adult patients with MS who are eligible for highly effective immunosuppressive treatments. METHODOLOGY: A formal consensus procedure was followed. Having defined the scope of the statement, we conducted a literature search on recommendations for the vaccination of patients with MS and specific vaccination guidelines for immunosuppressed patients receiving biological therapy for other conditions. The modified nominal group technique methodology was used to formulate the recommendations. DEVELOPMENT: Vaccination in patients who are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy should be considered before starting immunosuppressive treatment providing the patient's clinical situation allows. Vaccines included in the routine adult vaccination schedule, as well as some specific ones, are recommended depending on the pre-existing immunity status. If immunosuppressive treatment is already established, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. For vaccines with a correlate of protection, it is recommended to monitor the serological response in an optimal interval of 1-2 months from the last dose

Recommendations for vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis who are eligible for immunosuppressive therapies: Spanish consensus statement. / Recomendaciones para la vacunación en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple candidatos a terapias inmunosupresoras: documento de consenso español.

BACKGROUND: The recent development of highly effective treatments for multiple sclerosis (MS) and the potential risk of infectious complications require the development of prevention and risk minimisation strategies. Vaccination is an essential element of the management of these patients. This consensus statement includes a series of recommendations and practical scenarios for the vaccination of adult patients with MS who are eligible for highly effective immunosuppressive treatments. METHODOLOGY: A formal consensus procedure was followed. Having defined the scope of the statement, we conducted a literature search on recommendations for the vaccination of patients with MS and specific vaccination guidelines for immunosuppressed patients receiving biological therapy for other conditions. The modified nominal group technique methodology was used to formulate the recommendations. DEVELOPMENT: Vaccination in patients who are candidates for immunosuppressive therapy should be considered before starting immunosuppressive treatment providing the patient's clinical situation allows. Vaccines included in the routine adult vaccination schedule, as well as some specific ones, are recommended depending on the pre-existing immunity status. If immunosuppressive treatment is already established, live attenuated vaccines are contraindicated. For vaccines with a correlate of protection, it is recommended to monitor the serological response in an optimal interval of 1-2 months from the last dose.

[Prevalence and impact of comorbidities in patients with multiple sclerosis]. / Prevalencia e impacto de las comorbilidades en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic, inflammatory and degenerative disease of the central nervous system. In most cases it is characterised by the recurring focal neurological deficit, which may become progressive over time. Given the chronic nature of the disease, patients may present with additional diseases (comorbidities), which affect the natural history of the disease and its treatment in different ways. AIM: To summarise the available evidence regarding the influence of comorbidities on the natural history of multiple sclerosis. DEVELOPMENT: Patients with multiple sclerosis are at greater risk than the general population of developing both acute and chronic comorbidities. It has been shown that comorbidities can delay the diagnosis of multiple sclerosis after clinical onset, increase the rates of relapses and of accumulation of disability. Comorbidities also influence aspects of the choice of treatment and therapy adherence. Finally, comorbidities also increase the mortality rate and reduce the quality of life of patients with multiple sclerosis. CONCLUSIONS: Screening, diagnosis and treatment of comorbidities are a key aspect of caring for patients with multiple sclerosis to improve their long-term prognosis in terms of disability, quality of life and mortality.

TITLE: Prevalencia e impacto de las comorbilidades en pacientes con esclerosis múltiple.Introducción. La esclerosis múltiple es una enfermedad crónica, de origen inflamatorio y degenerativo, del sistema nervioso central. Se caracteriza en la mayoría de los casos por la aparición de manera recurrente de brotes de déficit neurológico focal, que con el tiempo puede tornarse progresivo. Dado el carácter crónico de la enfermedad, los pacientes pueden presentar enfermedades adicionales (comorbilidades), que impactan de diferentes maneras en la historia natural de la enfermedad y en su tratamiento. Objetivo. Resumir la evidencia disponible respecto a la influencia de las comorbilidades en la historia natural de la esclerosis múltiple. Desarrollo. Los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple tienen un riesgo mayor que la población general de desarrollar comorbilidades tanto agudas como crónicas. Se ha demostrado que las comorbilidades pueden retrasar el diagnóstico de esclerosis múltiple después del inicio clínico, incrementar la tasa de brotes y aumentar la tasa de acumulación de la discapacidad. Las comorbilidades también influyen en aspectos relacionados con la elección del tratamiento y la adhesión terapéutica. Finalmente, las comorbilidades también aumentan la tasa de mortalidad y la calidad de vida de los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple. Conclusiones. El cribado, el diagnóstico y el tratamiento de las comorbilidades son un aspecto clave del cuidado de los pacientes con esclerosis múltiple para mejorar su pronóstico a largo plazo en cuanto a discapacidad, calidad de vida y mortalidad.

Italian consensus on treatment of spasticity in multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: Spasticity is a frequent multifactorial manifestation of multiple sclerosis (MS), affecting mostly the chronic courses of the disease. Its impact on patient functioning and quality of life is profound. Treatment of spasticity includes oral and intrathecal anti-spastic drugs, muscle injections with relaxant agents, physical therapy, electrical and magnetic stimulation and peripheral nerve stimulation, alone or in various combinations. METHODS: This Italian consensus on the treatment of spasticity in MS was produced by a large group of Italian MS experts in collaboration with neurophysiologists, experts in the production of guidelines and patients' representatives operating under the umbrella of the Italian Neurological Society, the Associazione Italiana Sclerosi Multipla and the European Charcot Foundation. This guideline was developed in accordance with the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. A total of 11 questions were formulated following the PICO framework (patients, intervention, comparator, outcome). Controlled studies only were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Despite some consistent limitations due to the poor methodological quality of most studies, there was a consensus on a strong recommendation for the use of intrathecal baclofen, oromucosal spray of nabiximols and intramuscular injection of botulinum toxin. The level of recommendation was weak for oral baclofen, tizanidine, gabapentin, benzodiazepines and transcranial magnetic stimulation. CONCLUSIONS: There is a clear need for new larger multicentre well-designed clinical trials with a duration that allows the persistence of the effects and the long-term safety of the interventions to be evaluated.

[Remodelling of the Scientific Committee and a new series of neuroepidemiology reviews]. / Remodelacion del Comite Cientifico y nueva serie de revisiones de neuroepidemiologia.

TITLE: Remodelacion del Comite Cientifico y nueva serie de revisiones de neuroepidemiologia.

ECTRIMS/EAN guideline on the pharmacological treatment of people with multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a complex disease of the central nervous system. As new drugs are becoming available, knowledge on diagnosis and treatment must continuously evolve. There is therefore a need for a reference tool compiling current data on benefit and safety, to aid professionals in treatment decisions and use of resources across Europe. The European Committee of Treatment and Research in Multiple Sclerosis (ECTRIMS) and the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) have joined forces to meet this need. The objective was to develop an evidence-based clinical practice guideline for the pharmacological treatment of people with MS to guide healthcare professionals in the decision-making process. METHODS: This guideline has been developed using the GRADE methodology and following the recently updated EAN recommendations for guideline development. Clinical questions were formulated in PICO format (patient, intervention, comparator, outcome) and outcomes were prioritized according to their relevance to clinical practice. An exhaustive literature search up to December 2016 was performed for each question and the evidence is presented narratively and, when possible, combined in a meta-analysis using a random-effects model. The quality of evidence for each outcome was rated into four categories - very high, high, low and very low - according to the risk of bias. GRADE evidence profiles were created using GRADEprofiler (GRADEpro) software (Version 3.6). The recommendations with assigned strength (strong, weak) were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. Consensus between the panellists was reached by use of the modified nominal group technique. RESULTS: A total of 10 questions have been agreed, encompassing treatment efficacy, response criteria, strategies to address suboptimal response and safety concerns and treatment strategies in MS and pregnancy. The guideline takes into account all disease-modifying drugs approved by the European Medicine Agency at the time of publication. A total of 20 recommendations were agreed by the guideline working group members after three rounds of consensus.

Onset-adjusted incidence of multiple sclerosis in the Girona province (Spain): Evidence of increasing risk in the south of Europe.

BACKGROUND: Recent studies show an increasing incidence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in southern Europe. Although by its geographical location and genetic characteristics Spain is expected to be similar to other southern European regions, data on incidence are scarce. The aim of this study was to determine the onset-adjusted incidence of MS in the Girona province in Catalonia (Spain). METHODS: A prospective incidence study pooling data from the population-based Catalonia MS Registry was performed. Incident cases were defined as patients who had the onset of symptoms compatible with a clinically isolated syndrome (CIS) suggestive of MS in 2009 and fulfilled McDonald-2005 criteria during follow-up. Age- and sex-specific incidence rates were obtained. RESULTS: The Registry included 182 patients residing in Girona that presented a CIS from January 2009 to December 2013. Fifty one patients had the onset of symptoms in 2009, of whom 27 patients fulfilled the diagnostic criteria, giving an incidence of 3.6 per 100,000 (CI 95% 2.4-5.3) inhabitants; 4.3 (CI 95% 2.5-7.1) for women and 2.9 (CI 95% 1.4-5.2) for men. The age-adjusted incidence rate for the European population was 3.29 (CI 95% 3.2-3.3). CONCLUSION: The incidence estimation derived in this study is consistent with recent epidemiological data of MS in southern Europe suggesting an increase in incidence in this region.

Patología infecciosa importada en hospitales terciarios / Imported infectious diseases in tertiary hospital

INTRODUCCIÓN: En el ańo 2009 se crea en nuestro centro una Consulta de Patología Importada. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer su aportación en cuanto a capacidad, calidad asistencial y docencia ofrecida. PACIENTES Y MÉTODOS: Estudio retrospectivo entre 2009 y 2011 donde se analizan: a) desarrollo del conocimiento mediante la valoración de protocolos y publicaciones realizadas, así como la docencia impartida; y b) capacidad y calidad asistencial ofrecida mediante el análisis de los pacientes atendidos, la adecuación a los protocolos y la accesibilidad a la consulta. Se clasifican los pacientes atendidos en 3 grupos: grupo 1 cribado del paciente inmigrante; grupo 2 consulta tras viaje a zona tropical o subtropical; grupo 3 cribado de enfermedad importada de transmisión vertical. RESULTADOS: Se han desarrollado y difundido en la web de la unidad 6 protocolos y 5 publicaciones científicas. Se han atendido 316 pacientes: 191 incluidos en el grupo 1 (29 adoptados y 162 inmigrantes); 57 en el grupo 2 (94,7% Visiting Friends and Relatives y 81,5% sin consulta previaje), que acudieron principalmente por clínica gastrointestinal (52,6%) y fiebre (43,8%); y 68 en el grupo 3 con riesgo de infección importada de transmisión vertical (62 Trypanosoma cruzi, 1 virus linfotrópico T humano y 5 Plasmodium spp.). La adecuación global a los protocolos disponibles fue del 77,1%. DISCUSIÓN: Las unidades de patología infecciosa deben adaptarse a la realidad de la población que atienden, siendo flexibles en su estructura. Es imprescindible la valoración periódica de la calidad asistencial ofrecida, así como la valoración en la rentabilidad de los estudios complementarios a realizar (AU) - es INTRODUCTION: An Imported Diseases Clinic was created in the hospital in 2009. The aim of this study was to asses its contribution in terms of capacity, quality of care and teaching offered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2011, analyzing: A) development of knowledge by means of protocols and publications created, and subject taught; B) capacity and quality of care offered by the analysis of patients seen, the adequacy of the protocols and accessibility.The patients were classified into 3 groups. Group 1: immigrant patient screening, group 2: patient consultation after tropical or sub-tropical travel, group 3: screening of vertical transmission of imported disease. RESULTS: Six protocols have been developed and disseminated on the unit website, as well as 5 scientific publications. A total of 316 patients were evaluated: 191 included in group 1 (29 Adopted and 162 Immigrants), 57 in group 2 (94.7% Visiting Friends and Relatives and 81.5% without a pre-travel consultation). They consulted due to, gastrointestinal symptoms (52.6%) and fever (43.8%), with 68 included in group 3 at risk of imported disease by vertical transmission (62 Trypanosoma cruzi, 1 Human T Lymphotropic Virus and 5 Plasmodium spp.). The overall adherence to the protocols was about 77.1%. DISCUSSION: Infectious Diseases Units must adapt to the reality of the population and be flexible in its structure. Periodic assessment of the quality of care offered is essential, as well as an evaluation on the need for additional studies

INTRODUCTION: An Imported Diseases Clinic was created in the hospital in 2009. The aim of this study was to asses its contribution in terms of capacity, quality of care and teaching offered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2011, analyzing: A) development of knowledge by means of protocols and publications created, and subject taught; B) capacity and quality of care offered by the analysis of patients seen, the adequacy of the protocols and accessibility.The patients were classified into 3 groups. Group 1: immigrant patient screening, group 2: patient consultation after tropical or sub-tropical travel, group 3: screening of vertical transmission of imported disease. RESULTS: Six protocols have been developed and disseminated on the unit website, as well as 5 scientific publications. A total of 316 patients were evaluated: 191 included in group 1 (29 Adopted and 162 Immigrants), 57 in group 2 (94.7% Visiting Friends and Relatives and 81.5% without a pre-travel consultation). They consulted due to, gastrointestinal symptoms (52.6%) and fever (43.8%), with 68 included in group 3 at risk of imported disease by vertical transmission (62 Trypanosoma cruzi, 1 Human T Lymphotropic Virus and 5 Plasmodium spp.). The overall adherence to the protocols was about 77.1%. DISCUSSION: Infectious Diseases Units must adapt to the reality of the population and be flexible in its structure. Periodic assessment of the quality of care offered is essential, as well as an evaluation on the need for additional studieS

[Imported infectious diseases in tertiary hospital]. / Patología infecciosa importada en hospitales terciarios.

INTRODUCTION: An Imported Diseases Clinic was created in the hospital in 2009. The aim of this study was to asses its contribution in terms of capacity, quality of care and teaching offered. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted from 2009 to 2011, analyzing: A) development of knowledge by means of protocols and publications created, and subject taught; B) capacity and quality of care offered by the analysis of patients seen, the adequacy of the protocols and accessibility. The patients were classified into 3 groups. Group 1: immigrant patient screening, group 2: patient consultation after tropical or sub-tropical travel, group 3: screening of vertical transmission of imported disease. RESULTS: Six protocols have been developed and disseminated on the unit website, as well as 5 scientific publications. A total of 316 patients were evaluated: 191 included in group 1 (29 Adopted and 162 Immigrants), 57 in group 2 (94.7% Visiting Friends and Relatives and 81.5% without a pre-travel consultation). They consulted due to, gastrointestinal symptoms (52.6%) and fever (43.8%), with 68 included in group 3 at risk of imported disease by vertical transmission (62 Trypanosoma cruzi, 1 Human T Lymphotropic Virus and 5 Plasmodium spp.). The overall adherence to the protocols was about 77.1%. DISCUSSION: Infectious Diseases Units must adapt to the reality of the population and be flexible in its structure. Periodic assessment of the quality of care offered is essential, as well as an evaluation on the need for additional studies.

Viajeros atendidos en un centro de vacunación internacional. ¿Está aumentando el riesgo en el viajero pediátrico? / Travelers attending an international vaccine center. Is the risk for the pediatric traveler increasing?

Introducción: Existe la percepción de que están aumentando los viajeros pediátricos, fundamentalmente a expensas del grupo de viajeros conocidos como visiting friends and relatives (VFR). Las características demográficas y de los viajes en este grupo de viajeros confieren un mayor riesgo y condicionan una mayor complejidad en las recomendaciones vacunales y profilácticas. Objetivo: Analizar la evolución en el tiempo de los diferentes grupos de viajeros pediátricos. Describir las características demográficas y del viaje en la población pediátrica y analizar si los VFR difieren de los no VFR en cuanto a los factores que puedan conferir un mayor riesgo. Metodología: Estudio descriptivo transversal de las características de los niños viajeros atendidos en la Unidad de Vacunación Internacional del Hospital Universitario Vall d’Hebron entre julio de 2002 y febrero de 2009. Resultados: Se atendieron 692 niños, con una edad media de 8 años (DE 5,4). Se observó un aumento en el número de viajeros pediátricos y una tendencia al incremento de niños VFR en los primeros años que posteriormente se mantuvo estable. En los viajeros VFR la edad media fue menor, confirmándose una menor previsión antes del viaje y una mayor duración del mismo en este grupo de viajeros. Se actualizó el calendario vacunal al 29,2% y se recomendó profilaxis antipalúdica al 52% de los viajeros. Conclusión: A pesar del aumento progresivo de viajes internacionales y del aumento inicial de los viajeros VFR, el porcentaje de este grupo de viajeros se mantuvo estable en los últimos años. La escasa percepción del riesgo entre la población inmigrante señala la necesidad de promover una adecuada consulta previa al viaje en este colectivo (AU)

Introduction: There is a perception that the number of pediatric travelers is increasing, mainly due to the so-called visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) group. Both the demographic and trips characteristics in this group may lead to an increased risk and a greater complexity in vaccinations and other preventive recommendations. Objective: To analyze the outcomes of different groups of pediatric travelers. To describe the demographic and travel characteristics within the pediatric population, and to analyze whether the VFRs differ from non-VFRs with regards to the factors that may contribute to a greater risk. Methodology: A cross sectional descriptive study of the characteristics of pediatric travelers treated in the International Pre-travel Consultation Unit of the University Hospital Vall d’Hebron, from July 2002 to January 2009. Results: Of the 692 children analyzed, with a mean age of 8 years (SD 5.4), an increase in the overall number of travelers was identified, along with an initial increase in the number of VFR children in the early years of the study, although later on, the numbers of this group stabilized. The mean age of the VFR travelers was also found to be lower. A lack of planning prior to the start of the travel was also noted in the VFRs group, as well as longer trip durations. A routine vaccine was administered to 29.2% of children, and malaria prophylaxis was recommended for 52% of travelers. Conclusion: Despite the progressive increase in international travel and the initial increase in VFR travelers, the percentage of this group has remained stable in recent years. However, the perception of a low risk among the immigrant population suggests the need to encourage an adequate pre-travel consultation within this group (AU)

[Travelers attending an international vaccine center. Is the risk for the pediatric traveler increasing?]. / Viajeros atendidos en un centro de vacunación internacional. ¿Está aumentando el riesgo en el viajero pediátrico?

INTRODUCTION: There is a perception that the number of pediatric travelers is increasing, mainly due to the so-called visiting friends and relatives (VFRs) group. Both the demographic and trips characteristics in this group may lead to an increased risk and a greater complexity in vaccinations and other preventive recommendations. OBJECTIVE: To analyze the outcomes of different groups of pediatric travelers. To describe the demographic and travel characteristics within the pediatric population, and to analyze whether the VFRs differ from non-VFRs with regards to the factors that may contribute to a greater risk. METHODOLOGY: A cross sectional descriptive study of the characteristics of pediatric travelers treated in the International Pre-travel Consultation Unit of the University Hospital Vall d'Hebron, from July 2002 to January 2009. RESULTS: Of the 692 children analyzed, with a mean age of 8 years (SD 5.4), an increase in the overall number of travelers was identified, along with an initial increase in the number of VFR children in the early years of the study, although later on, the numbers of this group stabilized. The mean age of the VFR travelers was also found to be lower. A lack of planning prior to the start of the travel was also noted in the VFRs group, as well as longer trip durations. A routine vaccine was administered to 29.2% of children, and malaria prophylaxis was recommended for 52% of travelers. CONCLUSION: Despite the progressive increase in international travel and the initial increase in VFR travelers, the percentage of this group has remained stable in recent years. However, the perception of a low risk among the immigrant population suggests the need to encourage an adequate pre-travel consultation within this group.

Increase in the prevalence of multiple sclerosis over a 17-year period in Osona, Catalonia, Spain.

The prevalence of multiple sclerosis in the south of Europe seems to be higher than previously considered. This study aimed to probe a possible increase in the prevalence of multiple sclerosis (MS) in Osona over the past 17 years. This was a cross-sectional study including MS-confirmed cases from several sources of information. Crude and adjusted prevalence rates were obtained. One hundred and twenty patients fulfilled the study criteria. The crude prevalence of MS was 79.9 (95% CI: 66.3-95.6) per 100,000 inhabitants and 91.2 (95% CI: 75.5-109.2) per 100,000 among Spanish born individuals. The prevalence of multiple sclerosis cases in Osona has increased over the past 17 years to being one of the highest reported in Spain.